New scientists candidates for U.S. Congress fared worse than expected.
Views expressed in this science and technology update are those of the reporters and correspondents.
Content provided by “Scientific American.”
Accessed on 20 November 2020, 1743 UTC.
Source (email subscription to “Scientific American: Today in Science”):
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/FMfcgxwKjTZtlcwFpFhNXlGshrdgBmJD
Please click link or scroll down to read your selections.
|
![]() |
||||
November 20, 2020 | ||||
Dear Reader, I’m Tanya Lewis, Scientific American’s associate editor of health and medicine, filling in for Sunya Bhutta today. Scientist-candidates for Congress fared worse than expected, despite health being a major issue in this year’s election. Our partners at Undark have a story on how mathematicians model thorny ethical questions about who should get a COVID vaccine first. This week’s Science in Images photograph shows a male seahorse giving birth—a role reversal, compared with most other animal species. Finally, in case you missed it yesterday, we have a guide to evaluating the COVID risks of different forms of public transportation. Stay safe over the holidays! |
||||
|
||||
![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
LATEST ISSUES![]() |
||||
|
||||
Download the Scientific American App | ||||